Elements of Thought

Numbers are the underlying foundation of the Universe, or so suggested many ancient Greek philosophers. The pre-Socratic philosophers (before 469 BC) were the first to write and formulate ideas of a rational and empirical world, questioning the reality of the old gods and mankinds place in the cosmos.

Although sometimes antithetical to the belief in gods and pantheons, many of their theories were not wholly materialistic either. Most philosophers who first expounded these mathmatical ideas, such as Anaximander, Empedocles, Pythagoras, and Anaxagoras, strove to explain natural phenomena through rationalistic thinking while simulataneously exploring the rich dialogue of mystical philosophy which was taking place across the Mediterranian in this time. They considered their scientific ideas to be insperably linked to their religious philosophies, many of which were incompatible with the traditional and orthodox mythology of the day.

Pythagoras, who is largely remembered today as an ancient mathmatician, was to his contemporaries more of a magus and spiritual leader. He claimed that the mytical essence of everything is number, and would derive holy symbols for his followers from mathmatical equations, including the tetraktys and pentagram.

  He is also said (by Eudemus) to have discovered two new spatial bodies, the dodecahedron and icosahedron, which, in addition to the tetrahedron, octahedron and cube long ago discovered by the ancient Egyptians, were treated with great reverence by his followers. All of these were later taken up by Plato in his writing on Euclidean geometrical solids, hence the Platonic Solids.

  Empedocles was the first to put forth the idea of four natural elements or essences – Fire, Water, Air and Earth as the basis of the tangible universe, and that the balance of these elements was always changing and transmuting.

  Arguably he may not have been the first to posit four elements, as teachings of similar systems are found in ancient India and Japan, as well as some of the earliest Buddhist texts, but Empedocles was the first Greek to teach about it. Nowandays these elemental states correspond more closely to states of matter (solid, liquid, gas and plasma) than to our modern elemental table. Regardless of their scientific validity though, their impact on ideas and culture has been persistant for well over two millenia, and shows no signs of fading away just yet. A fifth essence was also suggested, more on that later though.

  Plato disagreed with Empedocles when he said that the elements were the MOST basic forms. He said the elements themselves must be formed from the simplest and most elegant of geometrical shapes, the triangle. He uses triangles (the right and scalene, which were to him the most beautiful) to construct the Platonic solids and attribute to them elemental essences. The attributions are as follows.

  The fifth essence, corresponding to the dodecahedron, was written of much less by Plato than by his student Aristotle. It was considered very sacred by the Pythagoreans, attributing it to a number of ideas, including aether, void, space, and the Quintessence or Spirit of the World. Correspondences can be found in many ancient teachings around the globe.

  An interesting story by Iamblichus describes the demise of a Pythagorean Hippasus, who “in consequence of having divulged and described the method of forming a sphere from twelve pentagons, he perished in the sea, as an impious person…” (Life of Pythagoras 18). This was clearly a pre-Socratic time, when these things were much less widely known.

  Platonic writing, whose original influences extend deep into the mist of Arabic and Egyptian pre-history, went on to influence many different movements, including the Gnostics and early Christian sects, Jewish Qabalistic scholars, as well as medieval Arabic and European alchemists, which in turn gave rise to modern Chemistry as we know it today.

  The essences or elements and their shapes are some of the earliest spacial constructs known to man, and were held with a sense of awe and mystery when first discovered for their seemingly divine structure. Some of these earliest thinkers provided the roots for what we today think of as “Western” traditions in philosophy and mathematics as well as Western religion, aesthetics and ethics. Nowandays these ideas are so common in our culture that we often fail to realize the incredible beauty and psychological implications of these early discoveries. The rationality of Western society since the Enlightment period still molds our education and contradictorily condemns the mystical practices and philosophies that once complimented and flavoured innovation. We often forget to consider the atmosphere of wonder and reverence in which these underlying principles were first discovered.

  I am very intrigued by these relationships, between nature and mathematics, between the physical universe and that of the psyche, the objective sciences and subjective worlds of mysticism and religion. For this project I plan to commemorate some of the roots in which Western thought was birthed by highlighting the essences as sacred thought-constructs, showing the birth of mathematics in a primarily mystical light, and reclaiming the sacredness of space that defined the time for the ancient Greeks.



Plato, Timaeus

Agrippa, Henry Cornelius, 3 Books of Occult Philosophy

Cicero, Chic and Tabatha, Antecedents of the Ogdoadic Tradition, The Ogdoadic Journal

Wikipedia 🙂


About ryanginter

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Elements of Thought

  1. jalexanderson says:

    Fascinating and in-depth. You’re exploring the roots of Sacred Geometry and I am really interested in what your creative process for this might be like. It’s exciting…
    By the way, I stared at that animated .gif image for at least 10 minutes! Where did you find it?

    • ryanginter says:

      Haha, it’s from a forum called Spaceghetto. (I won’t link it here, it’s not very appropriate..)
      Right now my creative process involve finding the right materials to construct these shapes, the joints are tricky.

  2. Very well researched subjects and idea. I am interested in the history of human theories and ideas, especially as far back as you’ve researched hits. I am looking forward to seeing your project!

  3. Yes, very well written and in-depth. Good research, as well.
    So: it’s time to specify what, exactly, you plan to make. In class you mentioned platonic solids that were big enough to get into, if I recall correctly. How and out of what? (Did you see the picture that Grace Boyd posted of a geometric-ish pod with her inside?) Where does the piece you make live?
    I expect you’ve seen the wooden platonic solid models over in ARMES made by one of our mathematicians?

    • ryanginter says:

      I went by the ARMES earlier today and looked at them, they were very well made. I’ve done a lot of thinking in the past few days, especially after class today, on all of the suggestions and input I’ve been given.
      I know that you like the idea of a solid big enough to climb into, but I don’t think it’s really inline with my interests, although it would be interesting. The solids are already 3-dimensional objects in physical space, most people can recognize that. My intent is to link to them personally in a formative and archetypal space, to map out as many associations as possible through daily meditations, recording my thoughts/experiences with writing and drawing (40 minutes per day on 1 object, rotating schedule), and display these writings alongside the objects of meditation, which will be laid out in a four-sided decorated totem. The shapes themselves may also end up getting decorated/fetishized as things proceed, it’s difficult to say how they will end up this early on. I will also include space for people to write their own comments and experiences with each shape/element for the final product, but the it’s primarily going to be my own personal experiences with them.
      The idea is to explore the sacred aspects of these shapes. We meet these forms so much in daily life, through advertising, media, and other modern visual stimuli that I feel a serious contemplative study is needed in order to get nearer to the essential ideas they evoke.

  4. Pingback: Elements of Thought #2 | Interdisc Studio 2 – A01

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s